Problem booting Kali on new laptop
Hello,
I just bought a new Lenovo N22 Intel Celeron 1.6GHz
4gb, 32GB eMMC
It had Windows 10 on it, but I bought this for Kali Linux only. I can run Kali live from my USB no problem. I also have installed Kali on my mac w/virtual box.
When I wiped the Lenovo and installed it, everything installed ok. But when I reboot it goes to the boot menu asking me which drive I want to boot from: The hard drive or Windows Boot Manager and of course neither of those work.
When I look at the hard drive in through linux terminal, it appears everything is there even GRUB. But for some reason GRUB is not kicking in.
I've restarted and reinstalled about a dozen times the last two days. Could grub be in the wrong location, am I partitioning the disk work or something??? I'm lost here. Any suggestions?
And by the way, windows 10 is gone and I have no way to get it back but I don't care... just FYI.
USB install with file system encrypted
Hi,
If I use this procedure (USB Live) to create an USB install is the file system on the USB pen encrypted?
If not, is there a way to have a bootable USB pen drive with Kali Linux?
Thank you
cld
Kali Linux KDE USB boot: ISO signature and user couchdbadmin
Hello,
I just installed kali-linux-kde on USB key with persistent data partition and I have two questions:
1) checksum
I followed this document to check that my iso image was ok: Verify the ISO Using the SHA256SUMS File https://docs.kali.org/introduction/d...i-linux-images
Checksum ISO = checksum in file SHA256SUMS but I have the following message about signature from gpg for Windows:
Code:
gpg --verify SHA256SUMS.gpg SHA256SUMS
gpg: Signature made using RSA key ID 7D8D0BF6
gpg: Good signature from « Kali Linux Repository <[email protected]> » [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 44C6 513A 8E4F B3D3 0875 F758 ED44 4FF0 7D8D 0BF6
Is it correct ?
2) when I boot on my USB key I see the following users "couchdbadmini..." and "root". Is it correct to have this "couchdbadmini..." user ?
I saw another post (20 of June) with this question but I'm not really convinced by the answer.
Thank you for your help!
Best regards
Yiza